The May issue of the Journal Spine included a review of the effectiveness of surgery for low back pain. Their conclusion was:
"Surgery for radiculopathy with herniated lumbar disc and symptomatic spinal stenosis is associated with short-term benefits compared to nonsurgical therapy, though benefits diminish with long-term follow-up in some trials. For nonradicular back pain with common degenerative changes, fusion is no more effective than intensive rehabilitation, but associated with small to moderate benefits compared to standard nonsurgical therapy."
Here's the abstract on PubMed.
What do you think of this?


Reply With Quote

